From Annual reviews to continuous feedback: Rethinking Performance Management


Performance management is an important part of HR management. Most of the companies use yearly performance to review employee performance. But this method is questioned in the modern working environment. Many workers believe that annual reviews are old, not suitable always and their actual day-to-day performance also influences less.

Employee performance is changing day to day in Sri Lankan industries like BPO, Manufacturing, and services. If companies depend only on the annual reviews, then it can lead to lapses in communication, late responses, and chances for improvement will be missed. Therefore, most of the organizations are adopting into progress by steady response systems which help managers and workers to interact frequently. According to CIPD (2023), Regular performance sharing can help workers get highly involved, clarity in their vision and support in their growth.

The change from the traditional to the modern approach method is shown below.

Comparison between traditional appraisals and continuous feedback systems

Both methods must be considered carefully. The usual method of performance evaluation gives structure, reports and formal process to qualify for promotions and rewards. In the other hand, continuous response gives flexibility, on time guidance to improve outcomes, and helps workers to match with company goals. But this can be achieved gradually by proper execution and if they fail then it becomes too much weight on the manager’s shoulders.

The continious approach can be understood by the following model.

Continuous feedback cycle supporting ongoing employee development


The worker’s wellbeing is the next main consideration. When monitoring performance, accountability is an important part to be considered. Sometimes that could build more pressure rather than supporting, if this is checked frequently. Because of this motivation may get affected. There is a research study by Deloitte (2023) on this, what he says is performance management can be effectively implemented by balancing the people accountability along with care. Also, managers are need to give comments that is fair and helpful for workers growing and not forced to lose involvement and burning out. Accountability can be properly handled when it’s combined with encouragement along with empathy.

Many companies in Sri Lanka are transforming into appraisal systems with more flexible methods. Most practical solutions can be approached by combining methods of formal evaluation with regular feedback comments. This helps companies to maintain accountability and support long-term development.

Balancing performance management with employee well-being

At the end, annual performance reviews are still considerable, but they are outdated and decisions cannot be made solely based on it. Companies need to focus on performance management by using flexible and people oriented methods that match present organizational expectations.


References (Harvard Style)

CIPD (2023) Performance management factsheet. Available at: https://www.cipd.org

Deloitte (2023) Global Human Capital Trends. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com

McKinsey & Company (2021). Performance management: The secret to employee engagement. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com

Comments

  1. E.M SampathApril 21, 2026 at 1:58 AM

    Many people say that continuous feedback systems are better, but in practice, they don't always make things better. Frequent evaluations can put pressure on employees, make them less confident, and make managers' jobs harder. In some cases, a well-organized annual review can give employees clearer direction and let them focus on long-term goals without being watched all the time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Devaraj SanjeevApril 21, 2026 at 5:19 AM

      Thank you for sharing this perspective. I agree that continuous feedback can sometimes create pressure and reduce confidence if it is not implemented properly. However, research also shows that when done well, continuous feedback improves clarity, engagement, and reduces surprises during evaluations . The key issue is not the frequency itself, but how it is applied by managers. A balanced approach where ongoing feedback is combined with structured review points may help maintain both performance focus and employee confidence.

      Delete
  2. Kriss StevenApril 21, 2026 at 9:17 AM

    This is a strong and very relevant discussion, especially the way you contrast traditional annual reviews with continuous feedback in modern workplaces. I like how you connect it to Sri Lankan industries like BPO and manufacturing—it makes the argument feel grounded rather than purely theoretical. The balance you highlight between accountability and employee wellbeing is also a key point many organisations struggle with in practice.

    One question that arises is: if continuous feedback systems rely heavily on manager involvement, how can organizations ensure consistency and fairness in feedback quality across different managers, so that employees don’t end up experiencing very different performance standards within the same organization ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Devaraj SanjeevApril 21, 2026 at 9:44 AM

      Thank you for the great question. You are right that depending too much on managers can cause unfair results if not managed well. Companies can fix this by using clear evaluation systems, standard rules, and meetings where managers agree on ratings together. Studies also show that fairness improves when managers are trained to act like coaches and when goals are clearly linked to business results. By combining structure, manager training, and regular reviews, organisations can give more fair and consistent feedback across teams.

      Delete
  3. Kriss StevenApril 21, 2026 at 9:18 AM

    This is a strong and very relevant discussion, especially the way you contrast traditional annual reviews with continuous feedback in modern workplaces. I like how you connect it to Sri Lankan industries like BPO and manufacturing it makes the argument feel grounded rather than purely theoretical. The balance you highlight between accountability and employee wellbeing is also a key point many organisations struggle with in practice.

    One question that arises is: if continuous feedback systems rely heavily on manager involvement, how can organizations ensure consistency and fairness in feedback quality across different managers, so that employees don’t end up experiencing very different performance standards within the same organizations?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
Remote Work and Talent Management in Sri Lanka: Opportunity or Hidden Risk? In recent years Remote and Hybrid jobs have changed the way companies manage people all over the world. In Sri Lanka, this is hard to adopt due to the structures of Industries, Technology is not far advanced, and the working environment culture. Managing people is to plan, monitor and develop is the HR’s role in this point, but to be successful in long term these methods must be in line with the company’s goal according to Armstrong (2021) . Sri Lankan management in logistics and manufacturing are used to sort the best workers by watching workers directly and their presence at work. But this doesn’t work with remote work systems, because it’s difficult to judge people’s capabilities only by seeing their results without their daily behavior This model highlights how talent identification and development must be continuously aligned, which becomes more complex in remote work environments. Integrated talent manage...
Read more
Image
The Rise of Skills-Based Hiring: Is Experience Becoming Less Relevant in Modern Organisations? The increasing shift towards skills-based hiring is transforming traditional recruitment practices, raising an important Human Resource Management (HRM) question: is experience becoming less relevant in today’s workforce? Organisations are increasingly prioritising candidates’ skills and competencies over formal experience, particularly in fast-changing industries (World Economic Forum, 2023) . Here are the popular roles employers hire for with skills-based recruitment: Skills-based recruitment From a strategic HRM perspective, this approach aligns with Armstrong (2021) , who emphasises that resourcing strategies should focus on acquiring capabilities that directly support organisational goals. Skills-based hiring enables organisations to address talent shortages by widening the talent pool and focusing on what candidates can do rather than where they have worked. This is particularly rel...
Read more
Image
Generational Tensions in Sri Lanka’s BPO Sector: A Hidden Driver of Employee Turnover? Employee turnover is still a huge problem, which affects Sri Lanka’s Business process outsourcing (BPO) industry. The majority of people speak about heavy workloads and low payment as the main reasons. As well as a rising issue is the gap between generations. Young employees who are just starting often struggle to get along with older, more experienced staff (CIPD, 2022).  This tension makes an uncomfortable working environment and forcing employees to resign. Recently, many BPO companies started to hire school leavers for entry level jobs to save the costs. As per the HR’s perspective Organization planning and maintaining low cost are the benefits that achieved from this process. What Armstrong (2021) describes is that hiring not only makes talent management effective, but also effective management confirms labour skills, behaviours, and company expectations.  Diverse workforce expe...
Read more